As the
>
I would like to
>
h|
Compliant Software
Compliance lives or dies on evidence.
Your team owns the policies, but dozens of tools and teams provide the enforcement. What you need is hard to explain and nearly impossible to prove. True proof demands that every scan and alert are configured exactly as policy requires — for every application, every infrastructure service, and on every change.
At first, that proof is stitched together with spreadsheets, screenshots, emails, and ticket threads. You chase down scan cadence in the CSPM, severity mappings in the SIEM, alerting rules in EDR, coverage in SAST/DAST, and exceptions buried in conversation threads. Audits become quarterly heroics, and drift inevitably creeps in before you even finish.
But your team is clever, and you begin to bring engineering strategies to your GRC program.
You invest in the standard playbook: write policy catalogs, translate them into control baselines, templatize what you can, wire change approvals into tickets, and add dashboards and bots to watch for drift. Tool owners tune rules quarterly, engineering adopts pre-approved configs where they fit, and exceptions are documented with expirations and compensating controls. Coverage improves and audits hurt less.
But the system still leans on human glue: exceptions pile up, integrations break on version bumps, drift reviews become a monthly ritual, and evidence collection never quite runs itself. You get closer to policy-as-code, but you're far from policy-as-reality. Headcount and coordination costs continue to rise with every new app, service, and environment.
Your team isn't drowning in work; you're drowning in coordination.
Every spreadsheet, every screenshot, and every "never-ending compliance conversation" you're stuck in is a symptom of a broken, manual system. The "human glue" required to connect policy to evidence is killing your velocity.
The Revanite Platform is designed to replace that human glue with an automated, programmatic connection.
Here's how you get your time back:
Your team gets the architecture & deployment accelerator. This is your new command center, and it plugs directly into your developer's CI/CD pipeline.
When the GRC team publishes a new policy to the Revanite Platform, you don't get an email or a meeting invite. Your pipeline gets the update—as code. That policy becomes the single source of truth for configuration and evaluation.
This is where the game changes. The platform uses that policy to dynamically configure your evaluation tools.
Think about that. You're not manually tuning scanners. You're not in meetings arguing about what to test. The policy itself dictates the tests.
Now, look at your developer's workflow:
A developer opens a pull request (PR) with new IaC.
A commit check kicks off. This isn't just static linting. It's the Revanite integration running tools like Privateer—tools that perform runtime behavior testing against the code in a pre-prod environment.
Instead of a meeting, the developer gets a clear, binary pass/fail right in the PR.
If it passes? It's compliant. The evidence—a Gemara Layer 4 log—is automatically written to the central data lake. The audit trail is created for you. You merge. You deploy. No conversation needed.
If it fails? You don't get a vague ticket. You get a machine-readable report that says, "This runtime test failed, which violates Control ID CCC-S3-05 from Policy ID GRC-POLICY-101."
Your engineer fixes the code, pushes the commit, and the check runs again.
This is how you fix it. You stop the "never-ending conversations" by replacing them with a high-speed, automated, and—most importantly—unambiguous feedback loop. You and your team get to be engineers, not compliance negotiators.